Listening to: Distance, Amy Winehouse, Hot Chip
I just finished Elaine Showalter's excellent and highly compelling A Jury of her Peers: American Women Writers from Anne Bradstreet to Annie Proulx.
Reading it, I was struck by just how many gifted, ambitious female writers who began their careers with a flourish and deep promise, ended up silenced in one way or another -- shamed, censured, marginalized, trivialized, or trapped and exhausted by domestic responsibilities. I was amazed at and grateful for the fact that things are so different for writers like me -- even as I was struck by certain things that haven't changed at all. I can relate -- uncomfortably so -- to what it's like to be accused of 'selfishness' because I had the audacity of prioritizing my creative work over housework (or, more accurately, supervising the housekeeper's housework). I can also attest to the necessity of finding a supportive partnership -- one that allows for genuine and mutual thriving -- if the roles of wife, mother (of multiples) and artist are to find harmonious balance.
So I was thinking these kinds of thoughts when I came across this profile of my ex-husband's actress girlfriend, the younger woman (23 to my 36) that he supposedly dumped me for, if you are to believe the cliched storyline a narrative like mine automatically gets reduced to in the eyes of whoever's watching. A couple of things leaped out at me:
they met in London when she was making an unplanned stop-off at a nightclub wearing a black ballgown (Versace or Armani or something, she couldn’t say for sure) after a formal event. Musk was sitting in a corner, head bowed over his BlackBerry, when they were introduced by a mutual friend.
[says Talulah] ‘It was all quite serendipitous, as Elon was about to leave and I was only there because someone I was with needed to drop in and collect his mobile phone from somebody. Neither of us are clubbers, so it was a happy accident that our paths crossed.’
E bowed over his Blackberry is his customary position, but the "neither of us are clubbers" line made me laugh out loud. (In fact, a friend brought this article to my attention just to comment on the 'clubbers' thing.)
There was also this:
He also has five children under the age of five – a set of triplets aged two and four-year-old twins, by his wife, the novelist Justine Musk. The couple are getting divorced, according to Justine’s blog, which states: ‘We had a good run. We married young, took it as far as we could and now it is over. That’s about all I can say for now, other than that it was a very sad and very necessary decision.’
This has happened several times now: quotes have been taken from my blog -- from me -- in order to support someone else's narrative about my marriage. This profile -- a puff piece on a beautiful young woman who, judging by the body language in that picture, seems genuinely in love* -- wants to make clear that Talulah is not a homewrecker, or Other Woman, or what have you. To that same end, in this Gawker article Elon stresses that the divorce was a "mutual decision" -- that although he was the one who filed for divorce, I "wasn't far behind" -- and this GQ piece also quotes me in order to support Elon's version of things.
(Meanwhile, this piece merely quotes me in regards to Talulah's hair color. That quote, you might have noticed, is no longer true.)
It's not like I was misquoted, or that I didn't mean what I said. I have nothing against Talulah. I wish her the best, and my kids seem to like her. But there's something going on here -- a certain tweaking -- that might be subtle, yet annoying.
This raises some interesting questions for me. When you are living part of your life in the public eye anyway -- when you blog, when your divorce has been kicked out there for public consumption -- when does this whole idea of "taking the high road" segue into this idea of being silent, silenced, even as someone appropriates your words to spin out a certain version of events?
So I want to say this:
Elon made the decision to divorce. We might have been mutually unhappy, and I might "not have been far behind", but the decision to divorce was not "mutual"; it was made unilaterally.
Yes, I was increasingly concerned about certain aspects* of the marriage and I made it clear to Elon that the situation was unacceptable to me. What I wanted, though, and what I was pushing for, was change. Divorce, for me, was like the bomb you set off when all other options have been exhausted. I had not yet given up on the diplomacy option, which was why I hadn't already filed. We were still in the early stages of marital counseling (three sessions total). Elon, however, took matters into his own hands -- he tends to like to do that -- when he gave me an ultimatum: "Either we fix [the marriage] today, or I will divorce you tomorrow."
That night, and again the next morning, he asked me what I wanted to do. I stated emphatically that I was not ready to unleash the dogs of divorce; I suggested that "we" hold off for at least another week. Elon nodded, touched the top of my head, and left. Later that same morning I tried to make a purchase* and discovered that he had cut off my credit card, which is when I also knew that he had gone ahead and filed (as it was, E did not tell me directly; he had another person do it). Five or six weeks later, he texted me to say that he and Talulah Riley were engaged. When he had taken her to the San Francisco Tesla store opening two or three weeks before, I did not even know she was in the country.
* which actually had nothing to do with the question of Elon's fidelity
** When a couple is truly in love and in sync, at least at that moment, their shoulders form a V. The closer the V, the closer the relationship. You can see from the way she has her hand on his neck and her body turned in towards him that she's totally into him; his torso, however, faces the camera and his thoughts seem somewhere else. With Elon, though, they generally are.
*** Cowboy boots at a store in Brentwood. Total retail therapy.
I just finished Elaine Showalter's excellent and highly compelling A Jury of her Peers: American Women Writers from Anne Bradstreet to Annie Proulx.
Reading it, I was struck by just how many gifted, ambitious female writers who began their careers with a flourish and deep promise, ended up silenced in one way or another -- shamed, censured, marginalized, trivialized, or trapped and exhausted by domestic responsibilities. I was amazed at and grateful for the fact that things are so different for writers like me -- even as I was struck by certain things that haven't changed at all. I can relate -- uncomfortably so -- to what it's like to be accused of 'selfishness' because I had the audacity of prioritizing my creative work over housework (or, more accurately, supervising the housekeeper's housework). I can also attest to the necessity of finding a supportive partnership -- one that allows for genuine and mutual thriving -- if the roles of wife, mother (of multiples) and artist are to find harmonious balance.
So I was thinking these kinds of thoughts when I came across this profile of my ex-husband's actress girlfriend, the younger woman (23 to my 36) that he supposedly dumped me for, if you are to believe the cliched storyline a narrative like mine automatically gets reduced to in the eyes of whoever's watching. A couple of things leaped out at me:
they met in London when she was making an unplanned stop-off at a nightclub wearing a black ballgown (Versace or Armani or something, she couldn’t say for sure) after a formal event. Musk was sitting in a corner, head bowed over his BlackBerry, when they were introduced by a mutual friend.
[says Talulah] ‘It was all quite serendipitous, as Elon was about to leave and I was only there because someone I was with needed to drop in and collect his mobile phone from somebody. Neither of us are clubbers, so it was a happy accident that our paths crossed.’
E bowed over his Blackberry is his customary position, but the "neither of us are clubbers" line made me laugh out loud. (In fact, a friend brought this article to my attention just to comment on the 'clubbers' thing.)
There was also this:
He also has five children under the age of five – a set of triplets aged two and four-year-old twins, by his wife, the novelist Justine Musk. The couple are getting divorced, according to Justine’s blog, which states: ‘We had a good run. We married young, took it as far as we could and now it is over. That’s about all I can say for now, other than that it was a very sad and very necessary decision.’
This has happened several times now: quotes have been taken from my blog -- from me -- in order to support someone else's narrative about my marriage. This profile -- a puff piece on a beautiful young woman who, judging by the body language in that picture, seems genuinely in love* -- wants to make clear that Talulah is not a homewrecker, or Other Woman, or what have you. To that same end, in this Gawker article Elon stresses that the divorce was a "mutual decision" -- that although he was the one who filed for divorce, I "wasn't far behind" -- and this GQ piece also quotes me in order to support Elon's version of things.
(Meanwhile, this piece merely quotes me in regards to Talulah's hair color. That quote, you might have noticed, is no longer true.)
It's not like I was misquoted, or that I didn't mean what I said. I have nothing against Talulah. I wish her the best, and my kids seem to like her. But there's something going on here -- a certain tweaking -- that might be subtle, yet annoying.
This raises some interesting questions for me. When you are living part of your life in the public eye anyway -- when you blog, when your divorce has been kicked out there for public consumption -- when does this whole idea of "taking the high road" segue into this idea of being silent, silenced, even as someone appropriates your words to spin out a certain version of events?
So I want to say this:
Elon made the decision to divorce. We might have been mutually unhappy, and I might "not have been far behind", but the decision to divorce was not "mutual"; it was made unilaterally.
Yes, I was increasingly concerned about certain aspects* of the marriage and I made it clear to Elon that the situation was unacceptable to me. What I wanted, though, and what I was pushing for, was change. Divorce, for me, was like the bomb you set off when all other options have been exhausted. I had not yet given up on the diplomacy option, which was why I hadn't already filed. We were still in the early stages of marital counseling (three sessions total). Elon, however, took matters into his own hands -- he tends to like to do that -- when he gave me an ultimatum: "Either we fix [the marriage] today, or I will divorce you tomorrow."
That night, and again the next morning, he asked me what I wanted to do. I stated emphatically that I was not ready to unleash the dogs of divorce; I suggested that "we" hold off for at least another week. Elon nodded, touched the top of my head, and left. Later that same morning I tried to make a purchase* and discovered that he had cut off my credit card, which is when I also knew that he had gone ahead and filed (as it was, E did not tell me directly; he had another person do it). Five or six weeks later, he texted me to say that he and Talulah Riley were engaged. When he had taken her to the San Francisco Tesla store opening two or three weeks before, I did not even know she was in the country.
* which actually had nothing to do with the question of Elon's fidelity
** When a couple is truly in love and in sync, at least at that moment, their shoulders form a V. The closer the V, the closer the relationship. You can see from the way she has her hand on his neck and her body turned in towards him that she's totally into him; his torso, however, faces the camera and his thoughts seem somewhere else. With Elon, though, they generally are.
*** Cowboy boots at a store in Brentwood. Total retail therapy.

Comments
Sending you much love and I still think, even with these (factual) disclosures, that you've taken the high road. T & E should have known better than to make any sort of statement about what happened (which is not the same for you as you really were the one wronged and had a pass to say anything at all to keep your dignity in the situation) and they deserve whatever fallout comes from this.
Thank you so, so much for your comments.
Edited at 2009-04-05 11:44 pm (UTC)
On the retelling of one side of the narrative... yeah. I wish now, in some ways, that I hadn't drawn into myself after my divorce. It was the right thing for me at the time, but it allowed the ex to get his version of events into public record, at the expense of mine. You have my (not-quiet, damn it) empathy.
laughing. so beautifully put.
(Also ::eyerolling at the astrophysics stuff in that article::
Thanks for your honesty, and I hope your future life contains only as much Drama as you desire it to have.
Because I know I surely wouldn't.
Sometimes I wonder if the reason why I'm so against getting into a relationship at the moment is the fear of loss of self, and not just the writer-self either.
I am sick at heart for you, sweetie! Your blog brought tears to my eyes.
Then I did something stupid...I looked at the link of your husband's 'fiance' and became disgusted that two people such as these would have so much disregard for you and your children.
Regardless of your relationship status with your husband, to have it flaunted in such a way is revolting.
If I could I would hug you. Please accept my virtual hug instead.
If you need a friend. I am here.
HUGS
Karen
Divorce sucks. You're doing a good thing by putting your little ones first instead of trying to 'just be right.'
What I *do* know is that the people who weren't there -- and that's pretty much everyone except you three -- will never have any idea of what really happened. We'll fill in our own versions of the story as we will, pretty much without regard to what any of you does or doesn't say. While they may ostensibly be about you, whatever stories are floating out there don't have anything to do with you at all. They're just projection; smoke without even the benefit of mirrors.
Take it from an actual "bad guy" in a divorce (albeit one of far less public interest): that can feel sort of brutal and ugly, but it's also a source of freedom. People will think what we think, no matter what you say or do. So why give a damn what we think? =c)
You get to choose whether and how you speak about this. If keeping your privacy feels right to you, do that. If not, do whatever else feels best. No one out here can take that choice from you, because nothing we think/say/post/print matters one little bit.
In truth, it's less about what people think and more about my own self-respect. E made the decision to divorce fully on his own, then pretended to "consult" with me on it so he could say/create the illusion that it was "mutual"...when I didn't say what he expected, he went ahead anyway as if my words meant nothing to him (and they didn't) and then continued to insist to me in days following that it was what I wanted, when in fact it was not (and I am the one who would know, not him). Irony is, that if he'd waited just a little longer the decision would have been truly mutual, but he got impatient...In any case, it's the total disregard for my own point of view -- by someone who should in fact have been deeply respectful of it -- that made me want to assert it at least once.
And life carries on. :)
Edited at 2009-04-06 05:29 pm (UTC)
But I feel it's very good of you to get your voice, and the truth, out there. Hopefully more will see it.
Something about the two of them just rubs me the wrong way.
and also for reminding me to pick up that Showalter book.
xo c
Edited at 2009-04-06 10:33 pm (UTC)
By keeping quiet, publicly, about the end of your marriage, you're not being silenced. You're choosing the high road. The people in your life--the ones who matter---know the truth. Your children will know the truth, eventually. The rest of us don't matter. The media record doesn't matter. Please do not take another step down this path (and consider not dating a corporate titan in the future! They're all crazy.).
There already is a public record, which is what I was wrestling with -- not the he said/she said aspect of it, so much as the simple politics of silence vs having a voice. In other words, sometimes the act of asserting that you even have a voice is, in and of itself, the example that you want to set.
As for the commentary...
He has a need to rewrite history, for fairly obvious reasons (people living out a cliche would rather die than admit the fact).
She has a public image to create/maintain, and, more importantly, a love story (fictional though it may be) to construct.
You have the nasty obligation to refrain from engaging (as much as humanly possible). I think it's great to say, "Their version of events isn't my version of events."
I realize that I'm a stranger and who the hell am I to comment, really? But I can't see how getting into details about the number of therapy sessions and weeks between this and that can do any good in the larger context. Especially because I think most people look at that couple and assume he was screwing around, or at least rebounding in the extreme. I don't think you have to supply the details. Nothing about that pairing says, "Oh, look! Two lovely, whole, sound, fully equal and unattached human beings happened to cross paths and, miracle of miracles, fall in love!"
Anyway, I salute you on all the many ways you've risen above the fray, and I'm sure we can't even realize how many bitter pills you've had to swallow on a daily basis. It looks like you're thriving and doing beautifully, and I hope this next phase of life brings you much happiness.
I *do* think there is something -- a lot, actually -- to be said for sharing experience (in a way that isn't mean or bitter or pandering, etc.). Why do people write memoirs? Why do people *read* them? As far as kids go -- what truly harms kids is one parent treating another parent with blatant disrespect -- or getting bits and pieces of (perhaps erroneous) information WITHOUT A PROPER CONTEXT in which to frame, assimilate, process them. Kids should not be treated like little adults -- which they aren't, obviously -- but they should not be underestimated, either.
In any case, thanks for your comments.
Life is too short to be bitter. :)
The boys are healthy and thriving and so is my ego. Be well.
but I do have to say, because my road has been sloped downhill for a while a. she may have youth, but you are much prettier. b. canceling your credit card is so classless I was shocked to read it. what a kick to the gut. and not about money. c. you live a rich (pun unavoidable) life and living well is the best, etc.
maryanne
video labelled Part 2, starting at 50:45
"there is a common misconception that drives me crazy a little bit"
"my ex-wife & I are getting a divorce..the divorce filing took place in June of last year"
"my ex-wife, to her credit, made it clear on her blog the marriage was over for reasons that had nothing to do with anyone else. In fact, she wanted to get divorced at least as much as I did, if not more"
"there have been some articles written that I left my wife & 5 kids for someone else"
Latest Elon & Talulah picture at http://tinyurl.com/danyjn
Knowledgable fans of Tesla Motors are complaining about the false claims of Elon being founder. This precipitated the actual co-founder (who was "divorced" from the company) to start a blog to "correct" the misconception.
We now have at least 2 blogs (here & actual Tesla co-founder) blogging to correct misconceptions about a split. Now, Elon is going to the media, on his side about misconceptions.
"Life is like high-school..with Money"
-- David Letterman
Let everyone bitch about whether or not it's appropriate for you to tell your story--the fact is, people do want to know. Your story is worth being told. I appreciate that it isn't disparaging but tells it like it is.