Previous Entry | Next Entry

speak divorce


Listening to: Distance, Amy Winehouse, Hot Chip


I just finished Elaine Showalter's excellent and highly compelling A Jury of her Peers: American Women Writers from Anne Bradstreet to Annie Proulx.

Reading it, I was struck by just how many gifted, ambitious female writers who began their careers with a flourish and deep promise, ended up silenced in one way or another -- shamed, censured, marginalized, trivialized, or trapped and exhausted by domestic responsibilities. I was amazed at and grateful for the fact that things are so different for writers like me -- even as I was struck by certain things that haven't changed at all. I can relate -- uncomfortably so -- to what it's like to be accused of 'selfishness' because I had the audacity of prioritizing my creative work over housework (or, more accurately, supervising the housekeeper's housework). I can also attest to the necessity of finding a supportive partnership -- one that allows for genuine and mutual thriving -- if the roles of wife, mother (of multiples) and artist are to find harmonious balance.

So I was thinking these kinds of thoughts when I came across this profile of my ex-husband's actress girlfriend, the younger woman (23 to my 36) that he supposedly dumped me for, if you are to believe the cliched storyline a narrative like mine automatically gets reduced to in the eyes of whoever's watching. A couple of things leaped out at me:

they met in London when she was making an unplanned stop-off at a nightclub wearing a black ballgown (Versace or Armani or something, she couldn’t say for sure) after a formal event. Musk was sitting in a corner, head bowed over his BlackBerry, when they were introduced by a mutual friend.


[says Talulah] ‘It was all quite serendipitous, as Elon was about to leave and I was only there because someone I was with needed to drop in and collect his mobile phone from somebody. Neither of us are clubbers, so it was a happy accident that our paths crossed.’



E bowed over his Blackberry is his customary position, but the "neither of us are clubbers" line made me laugh out loud. (In fact, a friend brought this article to my attention just to comment on the 'clubbers' thing.)

There was also this:

He also has five children under the age of five – a set of triplets aged two and four-year-old twins, by his wife, the novelist Justine Musk. The couple are getting divorced, according to Justine’s blog, which states: ‘We had a good run. We married young, took it as far as we could and now it is over. That’s about all I can say for now, other than that it was a very sad and very necessary decision.’


This has happened several times now: quotes have been taken from my blog -- from me -- in order to support someone else's narrative about my marriage. This profile -- a puff piece on a beautiful young woman who, judging by the body language in that picture, seems genuinely in love* -- wants to make clear that Talulah is not a homewrecker, or Other Woman, or what have you. To that same end, in this Gawker article Elon stresses that the divorce was a "mutual decision" -- that although he was the one who filed for divorce, I "wasn't far behind" -- and this GQ piece also quotes me in order to support Elon's version of things.

(Meanwhile, this piece merely quotes me in regards to Talulah's hair color. That quote, you might have noticed, is no longer true.)

It's not like I was misquoted, or that I didn't mean what I said. I have nothing against Talulah. I wish her the best, and my kids seem to like her. But there's something going on here -- a certain tweaking -- that might be subtle, yet annoying.

This raises some interesting questions for me. When you are living part of your life in the public eye anyway -- when you blog, when your divorce has been kicked out there for public consumption -- when does this whole idea of "taking the high road" segue into this idea of being silent, silenced, even as someone appropriates your words to spin out a certain version of events?

So I want to say this:

Elon made the decision to divorce. We might have been mutually unhappy, and I might "not have been far behind", but the decision to divorce was not "mutual"; it was made unilaterally.

Yes, I was increasingly concerned about certain aspects* of the marriage and I made it clear to Elon that the situation was unacceptable to me. What I wanted, though, and what I was pushing for, was change. Divorce, for me, was like the bomb you set off when all other options have been exhausted. I had not yet given up on the diplomacy option, which was why I hadn't already filed. We were still in the early stages of marital counseling (three sessions total). Elon, however, took matters into his own hands -- he tends to like to do that -- when he gave me an ultimatum: "Either we fix [the marriage] today, or I will divorce you tomorrow."

That night, and again the next morning, he asked me what I wanted to do. I stated emphatically that I was not ready to unleash the dogs of divorce; I suggested that "we" hold off for at least another week. Elon nodded, touched the top of my head, and left. Later that same morning I tried to make a purchase* and discovered that he had cut off my credit card, which is when I also knew that he had gone ahead and filed (as it was, E did not tell me directly; he had another person do it). Five or six weeks later, he texted me to say that he and Talulah Riley were engaged. When he had taken her to the San Francisco Tesla store opening two or three weeks before, I did not even know she was in the country.



* which actually had nothing to do with the question of Elon's fidelity


** When a couple is truly in love and in sync, at least at that moment, their shoulders form a V. The closer the V, the closer the relationship. You can see from the way she has her hand on his neck and her body turned in towards him that she's totally into him; his torso, however, faces the camera and his thoughts seem somewhere else. With Elon, though, they generally are.


*** Cowboy boots at a store in Brentwood. Total retail therapy.
follow me on twitter

Comments

( 43 comments — Leave a comment )
ozmaofoz
Apr. 5th, 2009 11:15 pm (UTC)
What's terrible, and I want you to be prepared for this, is that stating simple facts (the truth! which is nauseating btw...) will be characterized as vindictive while the happy fantasy (also nauseating) will be considered just good business. I'm glad you're not falling on your sword for her good PR. Cause that would be.....nauseating.

Sending you much love and I still think, even with these (factual) disclosures, that you've taken the high road. T & E should have known better than to make any sort of statement about what happened (which is not the same for you as you really were the one wronged and had a pass to say anything at all to keep your dignity in the situation) and they deserve whatever fallout comes from this.
moschus
Apr. 5th, 2009 11:43 pm (UTC)
No doubt it will be, but whatever (and just to clarify, I'm not saying that they were or were not telling the truth when they said they met only after Elon had filed for divorce. I will say that at the time of the filing, I didn't question Elon's fidelity, but that probably says more about me than it does about him). I just don't want to have someone else dictate the reality that I know I lived through, if you know what I mean, especially when it's something as painful and life-changing as this, with five kids involved.

Thank you so, so much for your comments.

Edited at 2009-04-05 11:44 pm (UTC)
suricattus
Apr. 5th, 2009 11:20 pm (UTC)
The wife-mother-artist thing vs the husband-father-artist not-a-thing has always driven me (and I suspect many others) mad. Especially when a point is made of "oh he was a devoted father" historically translates into "he didn't beast the kids or abandon his wife totally." It's getting better, but it still has a long way to go.

On the retelling of one side of the narrative... yeah. I wish now, in some ways, that I hadn't drawn into myself after my divorce. It was the right thing for me at the time, but it allowed the ex to get his version of events into public record, at the expense of mine. You have my (not-quiet, damn it) empathy.
moschus
Apr. 5th, 2009 11:56 pm (UTC)
"wife-mother-artist thing vs the husband-father-artist not-a-thing"

laughing. so beautifully put.

readingthedark
Apr. 5th, 2009 11:21 pm (UTC)
I love you. Not a creepy way. Just in a "thank you for being exactly who you are" kind of way.
moschus
Apr. 5th, 2009 11:56 pm (UTC)
awwwww. that gives me a warm fuzzy (and not in a creepy way).
bondgwendabond
Apr. 6th, 2009 12:08 am (UTC)
Bravo to you, Justine.

(Also ::eyerolling at the astrophysics stuff in that article::
blackaire
Apr. 6th, 2009 12:18 am (UTC)
Bravo to you for setting the record straight. And viewing this entry as someone who is a self-admittedly vindictive, I say you are most definitely taking the high road. :D
criada
Apr. 6th, 2009 01:30 am (UTC)
Thanks for being an example of how to take the high road without letting yourself be silenced. I admit, I wouldn't have thought to say anything else, thinking, "well, at least nobody looks bad. I may as well not drag things out." But as I've learned in my own life lately, sometimes a little stirring of the pot is necessary to maintain principles and avoid complacency.
Thanks for your honesty, and I hope your future life contains only as much Drama as you desire it to have.
miladyinsanity
Apr. 6th, 2009 02:16 am (UTC)
Bravo for taking the high road.

Because I know I surely wouldn't.

Sometimes I wonder if the reason why I'm so against getting into a relationship at the moment is the fear of loss of self, and not just the writer-self either.
karendales
Apr. 6th, 2009 03:13 am (UTC)
Oh my dear Justine!

I am sick at heart for you, sweetie! Your blog brought tears to my eyes.

Then I did something stupid...I looked at the link of your husband's 'fiance' and became disgusted that two people such as these would have so much disregard for you and your children.

Regardless of your relationship status with your husband, to have it flaunted in such a way is revolting.

If I could I would hug you. Please accept my virtual hug instead.

If you need a friend. I am here.

HUGS

Karen
i_amsherlocked
Apr. 6th, 2009 06:21 am (UTC)
::hugs::
Divorce sucks. You're doing a good thing by putting your little ones first instead of trying to 'just be right.'
bmused
Apr. 6th, 2009 07:16 am (UTC)
I can't even imagine the frustration of having such a sensitive private matter opened up for public consumption. Neither can I imagine the added frustration of having total strangers exercise poetic license with the facts of your life (you know, just to "punch up" the plot a little here and there because you've gotta sell those magazines/net ads). I honestly don't know how anyone maintains sanity in the face of that.

What I *do* know is that the people who weren't there -- and that's pretty much everyone except you three -- will never have any idea of what really happened. We'll fill in our own versions of the story as we will, pretty much without regard to what any of you does or doesn't say. While they may ostensibly be about you, whatever stories are floating out there don't have anything to do with you at all. They're just projection; smoke without even the benefit of mirrors.

Take it from an actual "bad guy" in a divorce (albeit one of far less public interest): that can feel sort of brutal and ugly, but it's also a source of freedom. People will think what we think, no matter what you say or do. So why give a damn what we think? =c)

You get to choose whether and how you speak about this. If keeping your privacy feels right to you, do that. If not, do whatever else feels best. No one out here can take that choice from you, because nothing we think/say/post/print matters one little bit.
moschus
Apr. 6th, 2009 05:27 pm (UTC)
Thank you, and I hear you and appreciate your points.

In truth, it's less about what people think and more about my own self-respect. E made the decision to divorce fully on his own, then pretended to "consult" with me on it so he could say/create the illusion that it was "mutual"...when I didn't say what he expected, he went ahead anyway as if my words meant nothing to him (and they didn't) and then continued to insist to me in days following that it was what I wanted, when in fact it was not (and I am the one who would know, not him). Irony is, that if he'd waited just a little longer the decision would have been truly mutual, but he got impatient...In any case, it's the total disregard for my own point of view -- by someone who should in fact have been deeply respectful of it -- that made me want to assert it at least once.

And life carries on. :)

Edited at 2009-04-06 05:29 pm (UTC)
ayoub
Apr. 6th, 2009 01:02 pm (UTC)
It seems as if the pair of them are trying to hog as much media attention as possible... And that tends to involve judiciously selected quotes...

But I feel it's very good of you to get your voice, and the truth, out there. Hopefully more will see it.
say.fat.last.myopenid.com
Apr. 6th, 2009 03:21 pm (UTC)
Wow
Good grief, what a mouth breather. I suppose they're told to open their mouths a bit for the camera, but still.. when you see a whole portfolio laid bare with every photo like that. More revolting than "hot shit".
moschus
Apr. 6th, 2009 10:32 pm (UTC)
Re: Wow
Oh c'mon, she's gorgeous, although I'll admit I liked her better as a brunette. :)
(Anonymous)
Apr. 12th, 2009 01:50 am (UTC)
Re: Wow
not so much. she looks like a little girl wearing mommy's make-up. it's creepy.
(Anonymous)
Apr. 6th, 2009 03:22 pm (UTC)
Wow! They say the truth hurts, I am sure you have pissed someone off. Be free, Be happy
silverspeck
Apr. 6th, 2009 05:20 pm (UTC)
Bravo.

Something about the two of them just rubs me the wrong way.
(Anonymous)
Apr. 6th, 2009 06:11 pm (UTC)
justice for Justine
California is a community property state. Assuming competent lawyers, justice will be done. 'nuf said.
castellucci
Apr. 6th, 2009 06:57 pm (UTC)
thanks for your loud.

and also for reminding me to pick up that Showalter book.

xo c
moschus
Apr. 6th, 2009 09:35 pm (UTC)
The Showalter book is excellent, inspiring, I couldn't put it down. Get it, get it now!

Edited at 2009-04-06 10:33 pm (UTC)
(Anonymous)
Apr. 6th, 2009 09:28 pm (UTC)
The kids
I think it's a mistake to take this he-said, she-said into a public forum. I don't blame you for being annoyed -- even enraged! -- by stories that romanticize and white-wash the very fishy beginnings of your ex's relationship with his little chickie-poo. But as someone whose in-laws continue to revisit this he-said/she-said drama about who really initiated their *1975* divorce, I can promise you that this road leads nowhere good. Especially for your kids. Don't create a public record for them to find one day. It might make you feel better for a moment, but it's a mistake. They'll be able to figure out the truth about their dad eventually.

By keeping quiet, publicly, about the end of your marriage, you're not being silenced. You're choosing the high road. The people in your life--the ones who matter---know the truth. Your children will know the truth, eventually. The rest of us don't matter. The media record doesn't matter. Please do not take another step down this path (and consider not dating a corporate titan in the future! They're all crazy.).
moschus
Apr. 6th, 2009 10:29 pm (UTC)
Re: The kids
I agree -- it doesn't matter who initiated the divorce, or even why. In the end, divorce is divorce. Sadly.

There already is a public record, which is what I was wrestling with -- not the he said/she said aspect of it, so much as the simple politics of silence vs having a voice. In other words, sometimes the act of asserting that you even have a voice is, in and of itself, the example that you want to set.
(Anonymous)
Apr. 7th, 2009 01:16 pm (UTC)
Re: The kids
Sorry...I was confused/confusing in my comment about the public record. I meant to (gently) encourage you to let the public *commentary* stop here. What defines the final "record" is a matter of debate, but you certainly have a right to decide that for yourself and your family.

As for the commentary...

He has a need to rewrite history, for fairly obvious reasons (people living out a cliche would rather die than admit the fact).

She has a public image to create/maintain, and, more importantly, a love story (fictional though it may be) to construct.

You have the nasty obligation to refrain from engaging (as much as humanly possible). I think it's great to say, "Their version of events isn't my version of events."

I realize that I'm a stranger and who the hell am I to comment, really? But I can't see how getting into details about the number of therapy sessions and weeks between this and that can do any good in the larger context. Especially because I think most people look at that couple and assume he was screwing around, or at least rebounding in the extreme. I don't think you have to supply the details. Nothing about that pairing says, "Oh, look! Two lovely, whole, sound, fully equal and unattached human beings happened to cross paths and, miracle of miracles, fall in love!"

Anyway, I salute you on all the many ways you've risen above the fray, and I'm sure we can't even realize how many bitter pills you've had to swallow on a daily basis. It looks like you're thriving and doing beautifully, and I hope this next phase of life brings you much happiness.
moschus
Apr. 7th, 2009 03:39 pm (UTC)
Re: The kids
Again, this isn't about what people think (or don't think) -- as you mentioned, people are already predisposed to assume that "their" version of events isn't mine. That was not the reason for the post, but I'm also not inclined to spend any more explanation on this (I've said enough in other comments & in the post itself).

I *do* think there is something -- a lot, actually -- to be said for sharing experience (in a way that isn't mean or bitter or pandering, etc.). Why do people write memoirs? Why do people *read* them? As far as kids go -- what truly harms kids is one parent treating another parent with blatant disrespect -- or getting bits and pieces of (perhaps erroneous) information WITHOUT A PROPER CONTEXT in which to frame, assimilate, process them. Kids should not be treated like little adults -- which they aren't, obviously -- but they should not be underestimated, either.

In any case, thanks for your comments.

Life is too short to be bitter. :)
cenee
Apr. 8th, 2009 12:14 am (UTC)
You are a very strong woman, Justine. I can say with certainty that I would not be given the same set of circumstances. And in saying that I am reminded of the saying, What goes around comes around. I hope that pretty young actress remembers that she was not the first, nor will she be the last, pretty face that turns his head.
moschus
Apr. 8th, 2009 02:47 am (UTC)
Thanks, but I don't have any ill feeling toward her. She's very young, and I know the man extremely well. :)
(Anonymous)
Apr. 8th, 2009 01:14 am (UTC)
those five under five need someone...
I hope, between the two of you, somehow put these children ahead of your egos and wanton desires to be famous, perhaps at the expense of your five under five. Most people who would have born these many children would be more inclined to devote their lives and energy to these children. Five is an awesome number. You would truly have to direct your energies toward them...and not this.
moschus
Apr. 8th, 2009 02:53 am (UTC)
Re: those five under five need someone...
'Wanton desire to be famous'? Damn, I should have accepted that reality show!

The boys are healthy and thriving and so is my ego. Be well.
(Anonymous)
Apr. 9th, 2009 12:22 pm (UTC)
speak, sister
brava to you. you HAVE taken the high road, but part of doing so is asserting your dignity. I couldn't agree more.

but I do have to say, because my road has been sloped downhill for a while a. she may have youth, but you are much prettier. b. canceling your credit card is so classless I was shocked to read it. what a kick to the gut. and not about money. c. you live a rich (pun unavoidable) life and living well is the best, etc.
(Anonymous)
Apr. 9th, 2009 12:24 pm (UTC)
ack
the last post was from me. I always forget to log in.
maryanne
(Anonymous)
Apr. 10th, 2009 01:38 pm (UTC)
Happiness, truth and of the future
Bravo for Sweet Justine, it takes guts to write of these things and you do so with eloquent balance and class. I see a happiness and freedom in your writing since the middle of 2008. You are blossoming, reconnecting and emoting truth. Stay strong, let the music take you to that sacred healing place. I'll bet that when you are in that place, you know you are more happy than you have been in a decade. Your future is bright, your light is blinding us and we so appreciate your continued blogs.
moschus
Apr. 11th, 2009 03:26 am (UTC)
Re: Happiness, truth and of the future
thank you much :)
chimpanzee00
Apr. 10th, 2009 09:10 pm (UTC)
Elon talks about personal issues
http://kevinpollakschatshow.com/

video labelled Part 2, starting at 50:45

"there is a common misconception that drives me crazy a little bit"
"my ex-wife & I are getting a divorce..the divorce filing took place in June of last year"
"my ex-wife, to her credit, made it clear on her blog the marriage was over for reasons that had nothing to do with anyone else. In fact, she wanted to get divorced at least as much as I did, if not more"
"there have been some articles written that I left my wife & 5 kids for someone else"

Latest Elon & Talulah picture at http://tinyurl.com/danyjn

Knowledgable fans of Tesla Motors are complaining about the false claims of Elon being founder. This precipitated the actual co-founder (who was "divorced" from the company) to start a blog to "correct" the misconception.

We now have at least 2 blogs (here & actual Tesla co-founder) blogging to correct misconceptions about a split. Now, Elon is going to the media, on his side about misconceptions.

"Life is like high-school..with Money"
-- David Letterman

moschus
Apr. 10th, 2009 09:47 pm (UTC)
Re: Elon talks about personal issues
I like the Letterman quote.
moschus
Apr. 10th, 2009 09:58 pm (UTC)
Re: Elon talks about personal issues
....and I also really like your icon. The chimp who went to space and came back with just a bruised nose.
(Anonymous)
Apr. 15th, 2009 02:37 pm (UTC)
Re: Elon talks about personal issues
Damn, if I ever become rich, I'm getting myself one of those....the girl that is, not the car.
(Anonymous)
Apr. 11th, 2009 12:40 am (UTC)
on your side
I'm glad you posted your side of things Justine (and this is Jordan Rosenfeld, a fellow Zoe member. I don't feel like getting an account). And I'm even more impressed that you've been able to maintan this blog with five children, esp. with the addition of triplets!

Let everyone bitch about whether or not it's appropriate for you to tell your story--the fact is, people do want to know. Your story is worth being told. I appreciate that it isn't disparaging but tells it like it is.
(Anonymous)
May. 15th, 2010 02:36 am (UTC)
taking that high road
My husband left me for a 23yr.old, he's 45 I'm 48. I have to smile and be "nice". I have to take the high road because he can behave like an ass but if I say anything I'm a bitter shrew.
blackadder
May. 20th, 2010 09:30 am (UTC)
Yo, Justine. I don't know you. I barely know anything about Elon (except he strikes me as a douche), I do love the Kitchen Cafe though (Colorado, etc), and I like Talulah as an actress because she is adorable in a few movies -- in interviews she's gone the Amanda Seyfried way, a complete and utter spoiled brat. However, I don't know if this is right or fair to show you, but I just saw this: http://t-riley.net/?p=1438&cpage=1#comment-2929 (I'm bystander) and felt you have the right to ask them to remove that whole comment. It really makes me feel disgusted and sort of icky that her fansite would feel the need to post comments you made from your blog as if it news. I don't know. Maybe I'm being really rude to show this to you, but UGH. I felt compelled. Anyway, sorry!
brasilmagic.wordpress.com
Jul. 13th, 2010 01:06 am (UTC)
Body Language
I'm a big fan in body language. She's hanging on for dear life. Tallulah may have liked his charisma (intelligent men are usually unresistable), but it was his success/money she couldn't resist. She seems to have the innocence of youth in her worlds, and a naive optimism about this relationship. Wife # 2...out of 4? A wife 14 years younger won't be enough when he is 60...and he will need someone 30 years younger? Sorry for the sarcasm.
( 43 comments — Leave a comment )

About Me

I'm the author of three published novels: the dark fantasies BLOODANGEL and LORD OF BONES (Roc/Penguin) and the YA supernatural thriller UNINVITED (MTV/Simon&Schuster). I also have stories in the MAMMOTH BOOK OF VAMPIRE ROMANCE 2 and ZOMBIES: ENCOUNTERS WITH THE HUNGRY DEAD. I'm working on a psychological thriller called THE DECADENTS. I am divorced, with sons, and live in Bel Air.

Latest Month

August 2011
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow