Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

a rolling stone gathers no mold

  • Jun. 30th, 2008 at 12:01 PM
older and blonder
Sharon Stone is really good with kids.

Or to be more specific, she was really good with *my* kid when we met her last night. She was showing E, me and the kid in question (Griffin, a precocious and bossy age 4) around a property in the hills* (in order to respect the various privacies involved, I won't go into details as to how this rather unique situation came about). She kept telling Griffin she had "surprises" for him, dropping her voice to a whisper as if they were co-conspirators. He took to her right away -- adored her -- as she introduced him to different elements of the property (a statue of a fawn glimpsed through the bushes, a stalk of lilac, an untamed rose garden, a bed of mint, a private little sitting area high up in the trees off a rock-lined stream). Excited and intrigued by it all, and of course totally oblivious to the fact that he was dealing with one of the last real movie stars to emerge when real movie stars were still possible, Griffin kept asking her "Do you have another surprise for me? Is there another surprise for me?" while his mother knelt beside him and urged him to be patient and polite and let Sharon talk to the grown-ups. Sharon, used to little boys of her own -- and suggesting we get together for playdates, like any other Beverly Hills mom -- was unfazed.

The thing that's so interesting -- or that I find interesting -- about seeing celebrities in the flesh is measuring the discrepancy between their screen selves and their real selves; how the latter can rarely live up to the former; always a kind of statement about fantasy and artifice and our hunger for these things, and how some people just have the kind of features that look better in photographs and film than real life. (Example: one night at Villa I sidled up to the bar and made eye contact with the dark-eyed dark-haired man beside me who seemed open to a little introductory chit-chat. He looks like Colin Farrell, I thought, except he's not hot enough to be Colin Farrell, since he was kind of short with a soft, pudgy look. I blew him off in the way you do when you quickly signal to someone Nope, nothing here, don't even bother trying and didn't think about it again until I saw a picture of the very same dude coming out of Villa on perezhilton.com and realized that it actually was, of course, Colin Farrell.**

And even when someone does look exactly like himself (or herself) -- I saw Jonathan Rhys-Meyers at Villa, and since I'm a big fan of the HBO series The Tudors and the excellent movie Match Point his presence in my proximity did not go unnoticed, and he did indeed look as if he'd stepped straight from my TV screen and into a contemporary casual outfit*** -- they still seem a little lessened by reality. Sure, they're above-average attractive, but this is westside LA, where the person taking your order or showing up on your doorstep to deliver your whycook order**** is likely to be dropdead gorgeous and you're so used to it and jaded by it that you barely even give a second look. In fact, I always wonder if that faint tinge of hustle and desperation that hangs in the LA air like its own kind of smog has to do with all the people who grew up attractive and got singled out for their looks in smalltown USA or wherever it is they came from -- places where a tall thin unusually attractive person might be granted a kind of weird pseudocelebrity-like status just by virtue of being a little bit like a freak -- and then came to LA to "make it" only to discover that they're actually not as tall/thin/hot as that smalltown had led them to believe and so what the hell do they do now when it appears that other factors -- talent, for example, and maybe even some education and IQ -- might be required if they're to distinguish themselves from the rest of the beautiful herd?

But I digress, because I was talking about Sharon Stone, and she actually does not look like just another everyday attractive person in LA who happens to be a celebrity. She wore no makeup with her hair sashed back from her face (wearing a very cute Missoni halter-top jumpsuit) and her face is so stunning in that fine-edged, symmetrical way that fascinates the gaze, draws it in, because it is so rare as to be a freak of nature in itself. She has a reputation for this up-close-and-personal kind of beauty, so that the last thing you want to do is compliment her on something she hears about a million times a day already.

Sharon and I share one mutual friend in particular -- my best friend, as it happens. One night while hanging out on said friend's amazing deck that overlooks a Bel Air valley and the cityscape beyond, mention of the whole China/Tibet thing came up (where Sharon was blasted in the press for apparently telling a reporter that China's earthquake was karmic payback for Tibet while on the red carpet at Cannes). Joanna asked me what I thought about it and I said something about how that comment was no doubt taken out of context -- it's amazing how untrue a truth can suddenly become when it's taken out of context and how embedded that untruth can then get in pop-culture consciousness (Al Gore, for example, never actually said that he invented the Internet or that he and Tipper inspired the story of Love Story but try to find anyone -- anyone -- who actually knows anything about what he actually said or how those comments then got spun in a way that spread like a fire in the Malibu hills). Still, though, I was surprised -- kind of shocked, actually -- when Joanna fetched her laptop and played a Youtube video of the actual red-carpet conversation that Sharon had had with the reporter.

And it was so...mild. It was the innocuous, thoughtful, slightly rambling talk of a person who'd been surprised by a question she actually found interesting and was giving her full attention to. It was Sharon describing her unfolding reaction to the earthquake: "So at first I thought this...and I kind of wondered...but then I thought..." and her end point was actually the opposite of the deadly little soundbite her speech got turned into. Instead of saying that the earthquake was 'karma', she was actually working her way towards a point about how in the end you should never judge others.

"It's like she's talking to a friend over coffee at Starbucks," commented another person watching the video, which was exactly the same thing I'd just been thinking. He added, "I'm just surprised that she wouldn't know any better about how to deal with the media, considering her career..."

"She just doesn't care," I said. "She just really does not care." That was the attitude -- accurate or not -- that I'd picked up from her, kind of this world-weary what more can you do to me air charged with more than a little fuck you rebellion, as in: This is who I am and I will say what is honestly inspired from within me and if you can't handle that then it is really not my problem, no matter how hard you try to make it my problem and I will not cower or kowtow or apologize for it, ever, or pretend that this game is not rigged, so you go back to your lives and I'll go back to mine. Peace..

Sharon herself obliquely referred to the incident...she was leading the way down the curving staircase inside the Tuscany-style villa, describing to us her vision of what could be done with the property and talking about some kind of conversation she'd had with a realtor, adding gaily, "...and no doubt I said the wrong thing, as we all know that I like to do."


* and I saw a wildcat! a lynx or a mountain lion or whatever it was -- this sleek unmistakeable golden prowling shape rippling along the concrete edge of a hollowed-out underground parking area -- I was thrilled and electrified, calling out my discovery, even as Sharon said, nonchalant, "Well then be very careful, because there's no way for it to get out of there," and I immediately imagined it honing in on my kid, waiting for the perfect moment to drop on him from above..."E," I yelled out, "would you please close that gate right now...?"

** what some people might find surprising -- and maybe reassuring -- is how male stars in particular really tend to chunk up between movie roles...and they are not gaining weight for a particular kind of role, please understand, they are just taking the opportunity to relax and let themselves go before they have to enlist the nutritionist and personal trainer and private chef to go into battle again

*** Rhys-Meyers forever won my fangirl love when he remarked in an interview about how much he loved style and fashion and how he could never live in LA because then he'd have to lose an entire season of wardrobe. As an LA woman and secret fashionista who loves cloth coats, scarves, furry boots and the like, I understand. Oh, how I understand.


**** or to check for mold. One of the most gorgeous men I ever encountered -- this tall, blond, beautifully chiseled Adonis of a man with a soft Texan drawl to boot -- showed up on my doorstep at 8 am one Monday morning in response to a call I'd put in about the possibility of mold in our house. I had to recover myself. Alas, our house had no mold. I was crushed.

Comments

[info]readingthedark wrote:
Jun. 30th, 2008 10:28 pm (UTC)
I think more people remember that Trent Lott spun Gore's original statement than described, even old-fashioned leftists of the worst sort like me who wish we could mark a little ballot marked, "Overthrow of the nation state, please. Especially because its dominant ideologies are repressive."

And they bored me to no end, but I just skimmed some recaps of the Love Story stuff. I see a pattern that I've always seen: many members of the press, especially men my age and a little older still hate Tipper for her pro-censorship stance. Nothing else will ever cleanse her from the taint that Dee Snider (who isn't that bright, but is very sane) and John Denver (who was very insane but also bright) showed exactly how misguided she was to a generation's worth of rock and pop fans.

Spin's spin. It makes the world go 'round.

(PS - got the book. very excited. waiting for quietitude and may re-read BA first for re-entry purposes...)
[info]moschus wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2008 02:49 am (UTC)
I'm sure Trent Lott jumped all over it, but my understanding was that the media just didn't like Gore that much and found it easy to take potshots at him -- he was (deliberately?) misquoted on the Internet thing and then Bush's camp promptly spun it to their advantage...My basic point being that except for a story in salon.com, no one in the media actually bothered to trace that quote back to its original source to see whether or not it was accurate and when a little something like a presidency is at stake you think they'd make a bit more effort...Spin just bugs the hell out of me, I admit. I was the kind of kid who got extremely irritated when my peers misused words like 'ignorant' ("That sweater is ignorant") and of course the all-purpose 'gay' ("That sweater is gay").

I heard from a highly credible source that Tipper's own kids were extremely mortified by the whole pro-censorship stance....Plus I didn't know that Denver was insane. :) I just remember how much I liked the Prince song 'Nikki' and even though I understood the lyrics perfectly didn't feel particularly traumatized by them.

Hope you like Bones...You would actually reread BA (or consider doing so?). I must say I am kind of...touched. Although fwiw I did attempt (perhaps clumsily, but one does what one can) to include enough exposition in opening chapters to get readers up to speed/refresh their memory...
[info]readingthedark wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2008 03:54 pm (UTC)
1) I find it utterly endearing that your solution suggests that everyone in America should read things. It's much more decent than my feeling that most of them should be throwm, screaming, into a very large (and, technically, metaphorical) pit.

2) Denver was quirky. I wonder if he was singing loudly to himself and got distracted when he crashed the plane. His PMRC testimony was something like: "Some people think 'Rocky Mountain High' is about smoking weed, some people think it's about breathing fresh air. It doesn't matter. It's just a song." Insane in the way that Fred Rogers was insane. Insane in the way that anyone who has long chats with their shoes or sweater (despite the sweater's attractions to other sweaters and what that sweater does in the privacy of its own bedroom), even if it's on camera, is insane. Insane in the way that the world of responsibilites and adulthood is something worth fleeing and avoiding 100% of the time instead of a healthy 72%.

3) I rarely read books more than once, but once I do, I tend to read them more than twice. BA has already had two readings, so -- once I find it in the piles and piles of books that run my life -- I'll read it again. (The titleholders, seven times each, are Clive Barker's The Damnation Game and some quirky novella called The Great Gatsby, but that once has a fake count because I happened to get it at least once in high school, once in undergrad and once in grad school. Plenty of short stories must be in the twenty plus range, but I don't keep a strict count and short stories are way more my thing.

4) I'm honored to kind of touch you. Oops. I meant to say that I've always known that you were kind of touched. Never mind...
[info]moschus wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2008 04:13 am (UTC)
I suspect if more people read things, less people would make you want to throw them into that very large and of course metaphorical (coughliecough) pit.

Or perhaps not.

I am possibly quite touched in the head.

[info]mojave_wolf wrote:
Aug. 17th, 2008 08:46 am (UTC)
Hi!
Gore said he helped create the internet, which he did through legislation he sponsored. There was no untruth at all. I don't remember the love story thing quite as well, but when I recall checking and it turned out he didn't lie about that either; the "liberal" media just went out of their way to support the lie of Gore being a "serial liar" because he wouldn't kiss their ass (pretty much what your friend has had to deal with; I remember previous harmless statements and perfectly justified stances of hers being used by sexist twits to pillory her (and don't even get me started on this primary season).

Must disagree about most actors looking less good in person -- Mia Sara and Drew Barrymore looked better (in Drew's case much better, she is cute in movies but was "wow!" in person; Sara went from stunning to beyond stunning; not my taste but Patrick Dempsey back then looked better than his back-then movies, & there were others who played "plain" who were impressive in person, and most I met way back in early 90's all looked pretty much the same as on camera; two of the nicest were Drew and Jennie Garth, who was super cool until I told her I was an agent, which I was then, at which point she immediately made a face and walked away from what had been a super neat conversation; weirdly enough Genevieve Bujold was super nice since she's supposed to be impossible, and that was after a previous phone call where I blurted out that she had one of the best voices I'd ever heard w/out thinking that this wasn't exactly businesslike; Sara actually snubbed me as the nobody assistant that was my career position at the time, but hey, style points for being so wonderfully cutting w/barely a change in expression)
(apologies for name-dropping but aside from helping my argument it was kinda fun)

Oh, why commenting -- I found your blog via your website after starting both your books; am including them as yet unfinished in the longish book review of everything I've read this year that I'm never going to get around to.

Here's what I wrote as a place holder, since you might get a kick out of it (and my reviews aren't usually *that* self absorbed, assuming you can stand the lack of grammar/sentences/punctuation and are even still reading at all at this point):

Justine Musk -- BloodAngel/Lord of Bones

awesomeness- horror/urbfant when she's on she's so good it's surreal this is the sort of thing I would have written in early 90's (love this now but would have been the absolute perfect book for me back then, sorta like Straub-Kerouac in 80's/Tolkien-McKillup when younger/ Thompson in 90's ya know there are patterns here, K/T/this & Straub/this) if I'd had more talent, or maybe enough focus/discipline to actually do what I should have done w/talent; plot totally diff from something I did write then but as far as setting/scene description evocations tonal resonances exactly what I *wanted* to do w/first screenplay; wonderful characters even the unsympathetic ones--pretty sure i'm not supposed to like the demongirl who answers "what did you do with the body?" w/"I was very hungry" but thus far i do; still haven't finished either/ started LoB first when had extra time in bookstore BloodAngel wasn't there but was second time got to check by / also that whole Westerfield capturing exhilaration of life thing done so well / lotsa addiction metaphor w/a 12 step tinge but like Angel manages to get away with it at least so far : summoners/dreamlines Del/sensation many/adrenaline-thrills (heh, me?) too spoilery? / descriptions of scenes & Ramsey painting omg / artist? / great lyrics must check out Hugh person

That's it. One day might get written as real review, or not. Am currently dead broke in middle of desert and you're not in local library system so will take a while to read these in fragments, but hopefully will eventually direct someone else to buy them (and eventually have money to buy them both guilt-free). Hope rushed midnight comment doesn't sound too crazy.

[info]rezendi wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2008 04:04 am (UTC)
I went to a Chautauqua talk about mountain lions in L.A. last year. There are at least six roaming the city. (OK, fine, for values of "roaming" strictly limited to "the Santa Monica Mountains.") Radiotracking indicates that they come remarkably close to humans, but are almost never seen due to their nocturnality and natural stealth. Mostly they live on deer. Sometimes coyotes. Sometimes they kill each other.

There was also a bear in those mountains a few years ago, briefly. Very briefly. The world's unluckiest bear. From what they gathered, it actually found its way across the 101, and then - they're pretty sure only scant hours later - was killed by a huge rock that fell from a ledge high above.
[info]moschus wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2008 04:14 am (UTC)
Killed by a huge rock that fell from a ledge high above.

After crossing the 101.

There are no words.

[info]xterminal wrote:
Jul. 1st, 2008 12:33 pm (UTC)
I have a massive man-crush on Jonathan Rhys-Meyers ever since (entirely coincidentally) watching both Titus and b.Monkey for the first time each in the same weekend. I must now see Match Point immediately.

Oh, and since it's now July 1, if the Amazon release date is correct, I should be sending congratulations your way.
[info]moschus wrote:
Jul. 2nd, 2008 04:14 am (UTC)
I love Match Point. I wish it was a novel and that I had written in. (I say the same thing about the HBO series ROME, both seasons.)

Latest Month

June 2009
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Kyle Flood